Desensitization in Iron Product Allergy.

Iron deficiency is the main cause of anemia in both sexes, with women being more commonly affected. Iron therapy is currently considered an effective and safe remedy to replenish the iron storages. Iron can be administrated both orally and intravenously. In particular, intravenous (IV) iron therapy is widely used when oral iron preparations are either not tolerated or ineffective. Indeed, IV iron improves iron stores more rapidly. Two main immunological responses have been described for iron hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs): IgE-mediated allergy and complement activation-related pseudo-allergy. Here, we report 3 cases of adult patients with iron allergy, who were successfully treated with two different desensitization procedures, respectively. Analysis of these cases demonstrates that, in the presence of HSRs to iron products, desensitization is an effective and safe procedure that prevents treatment discontinuation and hence allows therapeutic target achievement.

A 13-year real-life study on efficacy, safety and biological effects of Vespula venom immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) is a clinically effective treatment. However, little is known about its long-term clinical efficacy and biological effects. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for VIT efficacy, including reduction of specific IgE and induction of allergen-specific IgG4, but the overall picture remains elusive. We investigated Vespula VIT clinical efficacy up to 8 years after discontinuation and the kinetics of Vespula-specific IgE and IgG4. Out of 686 consecutive patients we retrospectively selected and analysed a series of 23 patients with Vespula allergy that underwent a 5-year IT course, followed by a prolonged follow-up. METHODS: Clinical efficacy of VIT was assessed as number and severity of reactions to Vespula re-stinging events. The presence of Vespula-specific IgE and IgG4 was also monitored over time. RESULTS: During the VIT treatment, patients were protected, reporting no reactions or mild reactions in occasion of re-stinging events. This protection was entirely maintained during the follow-up, up to 8 years. Skin reactivity (reflecting mast cell-bound Vespula-specific IgE) and circulating Vespula-specific IgE levels declined substantially during VIT. Notably, this reduction was maintained over time during the follow-up. Moreover, all the patients were analysed for IgG4. A robust induction of Vespula-specific IgG4 was observed during the VIT course, with a substantial decline during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that Vespula VIT is a clinically effective treatment, which induces long-term protection after discontinuation. The reduction of specific IgE, assessed by skin tests and RAST, closely matches the VIT- induced protection, while the IgG4 induction seems not to be associated with VIT clinical efficacy in the long term.